It is heartening to note that the rate of pension of a Subedar is less than what he was getting as on 1-1-2006.
For example: Table -36 of Cir 430.
A subedar of X group of 30 yrs of service, retired in the year 2002.
As per the above table, he was getting a basic pension of 11066 as on 1-1-2006.
Now , according to Cir 547, Annexure- A, his pension is mentioned as 10280.
What is this- Instead of an increase, there is a decrease.
Whether the JCO has to repay ?.
There are three periods mentioned in the Tables of cir 430,
Prior to 1996, 1-1-1996 to 10-10-1997 and 10-10-1997 to 31-12-2005.
The rate should have been as per the periods of retirement,
But the Annexure A, B and C of Cir 547 is prepared just for one period hence the anomaly.
The affected Subedar is questioning / asking us whether any recovery will be made on the basis of this circular.
There are many such discrepancies in the Annexures A, B and C..
Affected veterans are requested to verify their own Rate of pension and inform the PDAs not to make any recovery.
ARMED FORCES VETERANS LATEST NEWS BY
INDIAN MILITARY VETERANS
SPARSH RELATED NEWS
Capt KS Ramaswamy
Editor
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Exp:55%
No comments:
Post a Comment
Indian Military Veterans Viewers, ..
Each of you is part of the Indian Military Veterans message.
We kindly request you to make healthy use of this section which welcomes the freedom of expression of the readers.
Note:
1. The comments posted here are the readers' own comments. Veterans news is not responsible for this in any way.
2. The Academic Committee has the full right to reject, reduce or censor opinion.
3. Personal attacks, rude words, comments that are not relevant to the work will be removed
4. We kindly ask you to post a comment using their name and the correct email address.
- INDIAN MILITARY VETERANS- ADMIN