Army Vs Supreme Court Vs Human rights ???

Army Vs Supreme Court Vs Human rights ???

🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷

Col. A.N.Roy

I firmly believe that terrorists are born to be killed and they do not deserve any rights, forget human rights. 

Serving defense forces personnel in disturbed areas should be beyond questioning by the Supreme Court and a law to this effect should be made in the Parliament. 

I am forwarding this message to all the contacts in my phone book and request all of you to do so if you agree. 

 *Brilliant response from an army veteran to the Supreme Court's order on human rights in Kashmir.

An army veteran who lost a family member to a terrorist's bullet has raised a painful pose in the Supreme Court,

 *"How much do you know about the brutality of war? 

How many of you sent your children to the armed forces? 

Have you ever lost a family member in defense of the country? 

Do you know the pain of losing a young son or being a widowed daughter or watching your grandchildren grow up without their father by getting martyred so that you are safe?

 If not, please contact us .

Don't hinder the war effort. 

Human rights feel great when you and your families are safe in safe air-conditioned homes, but not when you're facing bullets and stones from an unruly religious fanatic mob."

Implementing the court's directions for the Pulwama incident, an FIR will be registered against Gunner Rishi Kumar, who risked his life to kill two terrorists despite their injuries sustained on their heads.

 Police investigations would haunt him for years, even when he was posted to other places in India.

 Courts will issue summons and demand his presence. He will be accused of depriving 'innocent' jihadists of their human rights and asked to justify the killings. They will be asked- "Are you sure they were terrorists? They didn't kill you, why did you kill them?" They will be asked- "Did you give them enough opportunity to surrender and improve themselves?" 

"Did you give them a fair chance to escape?" 

"Did you shoot warning shots in the air?" 

Instead of being praised for his heroism, he would be subjected to a judicial witch-hunt.

 What a shame for the country...! To subject active military operations to judicial review is a bizarre idea.

 While all nations give their soldiers the right to defeat the enemies of the state, India takes pride in fettering them.

Addressing the US Naval Academy in April 2010, United States Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates said: "You have answered the call of the trumpet. For my part, I feel personally to each of you." as if you were my own sons and daughters.** and when I send you to harm as I wish, I will do everything in my power to see that you have what All you need to do is fulfill your mission - and come home safely." 

Clearly, the Supreme Court of India thinks differently. 

The human rights of the enemies of the state seem to be more important than the security of the country. 

As a serving officer finally remarked - "The Supreme Court has given us two options - get killed, the country will honor your martyrdom or kill the terrorist and face years of police/judicial investigation."

 Their fears are real and most shared.

 Wonder which soldier would be ready to serve in such a hostile environment!

 Appeal to all Indians:- However, let us all make it a mass movement so that the Supreme Court reconsiders the issue and appreciates its seriousness. 

We cannot fight for India on the borders but we can fight for the betterment of our soldiers from the safety of our homes.