Army Chief questions officers moving court - Indian Military Veterans



-----------------------------------------------








Veterans Welfare Latest News & 
Updates on various issues 
related to


Tri Services Pension – SPARSH -OROP

  ECHS - CSD 


Pay Fixation and Service/Pension Rules
as per orders & Instructions of Govt of India.


Purpose of this website


             Pensioners of the Armed Forces  are different from  pensioners of  other departments of the Government of India. Some rules and regulations apply to public services. In order to sensitize them about the various rules, regulations, government programs related to ex-servicemen and the various social assistance programs for families of ex-servicemen, we refer to the government instructions on this subject. , published information on related topics. Here, we will discuss SPARSH, CSD, ECHS, OROPfamily pension, disability pension, Service pension, re-employment with life certificate and other welfare activities  to increase the awareness of beneficiaries. 

Regards,
KS RAMASWAMY 
Editor

Sep 4, 2018

Army Chief questions officers moving court

Army Chief questions officers moving court

Asks why file individual cases related to insurgency areas


Ajay Banerjee

Tribune News Service

New Delhi, September 2

In a significant move, Army Chief General Bipin Rawat has expressed his “disagreement” over a spate in court cases filed by serving officers, even as he warned that moral turpitude will not go unpunished. He has also halted activities of the Army Wives Welfare Association (AWWA) in field areas.


Has it occured to the Army Chief to protect his men from court cases when the law (The Army Act) already empowers him to do so?  Why is he also not a petitioner in the Court cases along with his officers? 

Faced with a “running commentary” on the social media over his decisions, General Rawat addressed Colonel-level officers posted in New Delhi at Manekshaw Centre here on Saturday.

Finally!


He questioned the need for serving officers to file individual cases challenging ongoing criminal cases faced by fellow officers serving in insurgency-hit areas.


Because today it is turn of the few targeted. Tomorrow it will be their turn. 

An officer, speaking to The Tribune, quoted the Army Chief as saying: “The Army was fighting these cases, now if these guys (the petitioners in court) lose the case, what will happen?”


How was the Army fighting these cases? Has the Army won anywhere? It is this lack of confidence in the Army (and Gen Rawat!) that caused the officers to go to court. Please see first comment above. 

In an unprecedented move, nearly 700 Army officers and soldiers have approached the Supreme Court against dilution of the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) that shielded them from prosecution without the Centre’s nod. General Rawat spoke about restructuring the Army, cost-cutting, rank-parity with civilian officers, anomalies in salary, opening of Cantonment roads and also the non-functional upgrade (NFU), sources said.


Anything achieved? Only talk?

Addressing moral turpitude, General Rawat said the person would no longer just be “boarded out”. He would get exemplary punishment like jail and dismissal, irrespective of rank, he asserted.


Why such draconian measures for the Army? When civil society is thoroughly corrupt? Is the Indian Army different from the Indian Psyche?  

He said there would be no AWWA units in field areas and wanted the activities to be coordinated keeping in mind that several of the wives of officers were working professionals.

On rank parity and equivalence with civilian officers, he said armed forces officers were different, unique and formed an “elite” service, even above the all-India services and asked that officers should not compare themselves with civilian officers. His remarks triggered a tirade on the social media on Sunday with questions being raised as to how terming the forces as “elite” meant nothing as a democratic structure ran by rules and regulations.


Yes, Armed Forces Officers are elite but the elite of India's youth no longer joins this elite organisation. You get your officer class from the sons of chaiwallahs and even proudly proclaim it as democracy in action. 

The Army Chief said criticism should not come before decisions were made. He referred to the study ordered to abolish the rank of Brigadier. “Let the study be complete before running to comment,” he said.


The whole bloody world has Brigadiers. They command Brigades. For pay parity you are abolishing this rank?

Speaking on NFU — another matter before the SC — the Army Chief said it would come but the matter was sub-judice and the military service pay could possibly be withdrawn as retaliation. NFU was granted to civilian officials in 2006, prompting the officers to file a case in the Armed Forces Tribunal in 2015. The Defence Ministry filed a special leave petition in the SC recently. The 7th Central Pay Commission has allowed NFU to Army officers.


The Army files a case in Court and it stays there. For others, the Supreme Court even opens its doors at midnight. So the MSP is being withdrawn? Then how is the Military Officer elite?  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Indian Military Veterans Viewers, ..

Each of you is part of the Indian Military Veterans message.
We kindly request you to make healthy use of this section which welcomes the freedom of expression of the readers.

Note:

1. The comments posted here are the readers' own comments. Veterans news is not responsible for this in any way.
2. The Academic Committee has the full right to reject, reduce or censor opinion.
3. Personal attacks, rude words, comments that are not relevant to the work will be removed
4. We kindly ask you to post a comment using their name and the correct email address.

- INDIAN MILITARY VETERANS- ADMIN

Sponsor

LATEST NEWS

Post Top Ad